用户讨论:Menchi
请别在此贴招兵买马类型的类型的转贴水文。
我有时间会尽快回答，要不然就稍等…几年！ 新的留言在最下面：
Long Time no see
he....he....he.....^^--虎儿 01:22 2005年1月22日 (UTC)
- :o) --Menchi 02:31 2005年1月22日 (UTC)
- :-o hkgolden
鸥
Thanks very much. I photograph these birds in beijing beihai park and taoranting park. --User:用心阁
渔鸥,in en:Pallas's gull，那片子是在北京动物园拍的，北美的鸟出现在北京的几率太小了，前两天刚听有的鸟友说动物园来个渔鸥--有组织无纪律 (talk) 看看雪夜猫子是个啥 10:34 2005年2月17日 (UTC)
- You're probably right! --Menchi 20:16 2005年2月17日 (UTC)
Am I nosy? I can't tell and don't know
I just read your comment on User talk:Seasurfer: it's definitely a good one. It's better to guide a newbie the right way of editing than correct errors later, even in risk of hurting a newbie mood of wikipedia. Btw, how's your reading week, assuming your study in a postsecondary institution? :) ZZZ...很困 (对话、留言按这里) 23:08 2005年2月20日 (UTC)
- Thank you for understanding. I just replied Seasurfer below, then I saw your message. Yeah...phew! I thought my comments may be misunderstood and tried hard to write my explanations in a really nice friendly tone, but to excite this much anger? Woa! Anyway, I really am not gonna bother with this idea of "keep it Chinese, it's Chinese WP!" I do not own this place and I'm way too tired to stage a takeover. ;-) People can do what they want, I'm not gonna be pushy about it. --Menchi (讨论页)Â 03:39 2005年2月21日 (UTC)
Essential use of English
Regarding to the way you edit my post, I find it extremely intrusive and rude.
You should ask my opinion first before you did such a thing, I may have my own reason behind.
Why I listed those English terms? First, most medical articles and most new discoveries are written in English, whatever I wrote today could be outdated tomorrow, I put those English terms there because readers might want to have more infomation. It could help them to find more information in English.
Second, regrading this: "However, it is purely unnecessary to, in a Chinese text, say things like " "英语中的其他名称：" Since this is an encylopedia, why can't I list those terms that are also commonly use in the world, regardless of language.
No reason to benefit other languages users doesn't mean that it doesn't benefit people who can use English! Why the hell you want to stop benefiting people who you can benefit just because it may not benefit everyone, your kind of thinking is selfish!
I don't see by mentioning the name in other languages will made it unreadable multilingual junk. Remember, I am only listing those terms in English, not writting the whole article in English. That is no rule in wikipedia to stop listing names in other languages!!!
I find that you extremely arrogant, what "baby article" you mean!!! Just because you join in earlier than me doesnt mean that you have the right to everything and do whatever you want to a person who just joined.
Lastly, I am a medical student, and I clearly know every single terms of it, in both languages, even French, Japanese, Malay, not as what you say unsure of those terms!!! Don't make such kind irresponsible comment!!! I retained some English words, because they are names!!! There is no official translation of those names yet, I think it is best to remain those original name, so people can verity it on their own!!!
If you want the names of other languages, I can do it too, but it is not necessary, as a medical student, I knew clearly that the latest infomation are most likely written in English!!! Please stop doing such stupid thing, and has such stupid thinking!!! You want every thing to be in 100% chinese, I can tell you that is fat hope, today, languages interact more frequently than in the past!!! Don't be such a purist, and hinder the propagation of knowledge.
I really don't like this kind of stupid and unnessery argument, I think this time could be use to write more articles. And stop doing such an unnessary thing!!! Your time can be used better!!!
--阿仁 02:43 2005年2月21日 (UTC)
- And I thought I made it clear in my comments that my constructive criticism shouldn't be taken the wrong way. But evidently, they were! Well, I'm not sure how much more I could do to emphasis that my suggestions were not -- are not-- meant to hurt your feeling. It's important not to take ownership in WP and consider stuff one wrote as "one's article". But nevertheless, I expressed my understanding that you probably feel it's precious to you. That's what I mean by "baby" -- precious and cared for. But you seem to mistake it to mean "litte/sucky". That was not what I meant. In fact, in my very first sentence, I said your article was a great work.
- And the "multilingual junk" part is what could happen if we add in every single language -- English, French, German, Spanish, Tagalog, Arabic, Zulu, Inuktitut. Can you imagine how messy and lengthy that'd be? That's just job of Wiktionary and Wikibooks. But apparently you don't see that distinction important. Well, I tried to explain, and I won't try to change your idea again.
- And the rest of my comments were -- I honestly thought -- pretty polite and nice. I made the effort of going to your talk page to explain my edit on your article. I went out of my way, thinking my explanation could help you understand the Chinese WP. But you apparently are not interested in hearing what I said, since you "clearly know every single terms of it, in both languages, even French, Japanese, Malay". I was wrong to assume you'd hear me out. My bad. You're right that I should really spend my time more wisely. So, I apologize to writing such a comment to you. I won't ever give you feedback ever again (unless I forget this encounter, which is unlikely!) I'm sorry if I made your Wikipedian experience unpleasant. I hope you do more good works.
- I, on the other hand, will just live with the fact that the Chinese Wikipedia is evolving into Chinese-English Wikipedia and move on. I apparently only offend people by trying to be a "purist". This is the last time I'm taking extraneous English text out of WP. Nobody else seems to mind, so I shall get on the bandwagon! --Menchi (讨论页)Â 03:28 2005年2月21日 (UTC)
I welcomed your comment, but I think you should discuss it first rather putting everything into your hands first. Because other people may have a different opinion on it, and more importantly, this is not something against the rule of wikipedia, shouldn't you discuss it first? It is a gesture of respect.
The fact today is, even in China and Taiwan, most medical articles will come along with English terms, reason is simple, it helps to understand better, I would say, most chinese or taiwanese medical students and reseachers can't rely on chinese article alone, they have to search for English article to facilitate or expand their knowledge, I knew this, that is why I put those English terms, why I don't put french terms, because, the word dengue is the same as in french. Why i dont put other languages, because, at the current trend, it doesn't help much, I put it in Japanese, because I knew, Japanese has a lot of info too, imagine, while translating this article, I did some read up on some Japanese source...although not significant compare to English, but what is the harm of listing it? no harm being done right?
After I post this article it is free for everyone to use and edit, I own no right to it, I knew it from the beginning of the day I start to write. And I dont take it personally, there is nothing i can do, if you insist on it, and I am also not going to waste my time to reedit it back again. But what i want to say is, there is no harm at all mentioning other langauges.
To tell you the truth, I have also thought of this question too, why should i only mention it in English and not other languages while i wrote this article. Since I knew the terms for other languages as well. However, I have to admit to the fact that, English is currently the dominating language in most scientific field and medical field. It is very unwise if i didnt mention the current term in English....if you are a researcher reading this article, would you like to find more info about it? What will come to your mind first? go and do some research on those english journals right? and if there is no english term there, then those people have to take the trouble to look it up in the dictionary or worst, they may not be able to find the correspoding english term sometime, this is the case the i frequently encounter...
The main reason I came to Chinese Wikipedia, because there are too little articles on Chinese Wikipedia, I wanted to do some contribution, to expand the knowledge in Chinese language, one reason, why people do not use chinese as a research language is because, there is simply not enough of material for use in research. The reason, why i have not written this article in English, is because, there is already a lot of info on this subject in english, but not in chinese...--阿仁/Seasurfer 04:12 2005年2月21日 (UTC)
- Menchi's comments were appropiate; but newbies, including Seasurfer, sometimes though not intentionally, do misinterpret good intensions. IMO Seasurfer was furious about the way the post was edited. Maybe a discussion before editing would smooth things out and a reading for Seasurfer at en:Wikipedia:Replies to common objections would help. Anyway, guys, don't take it personally. Wikipedians write stuff for The Reader: when different ideas crash, emotions tend to blow out of proportion.
- Don't give up hope, Menchi. Your presence is an asset to Wikipedia. You kept your cool while being called for promoting Taiwan independence in a sentence on your user page. I can assure that this comparatively petty incident will not affect your passion at wikipedia. As for Seasurfer, medical expertise is also in dire need at Chinese wikipedia. I can further assure that all of us are here for the ultimate goal: The Reader...and a lasting site of the information :-) Relax and lay back. ～～ZZZ...很困 (对话、留言按这里) 04:50 2005年2月21日 (UTC)
在[1]这本汉越字典上“琰”是Diệm，中华民国当时和南越有正式外交关系，如果中华民国外交单位把南越总统的名字弄错，不可能不被当时的南越政府纠正 --无名氏
welcome back
hi, Menchi, welcome back. Long time no see.--Theodoranian|虎儿 (talk) 02:23 2005年6月1日 (UTC)
欢迎回来
看到上面虎儿的留言已经是6年前的事情了，呵呵。欢迎回来！--Mountain (留言) 2011年7月4日 (一) 23:24 (UTC)
邀请您参与条目质量提升活动
为了提升中文维基百科的条目数量及品质，条目质量提升计画已经重新启动并已大幅改版，成为多元化型态子计画方式展开，相信您的支持，将有可能会成为维基成长的重要助益，若您对于一些条目品质现况感到不满，或者对于某些主题条目需要关注提升，竭诚欢迎您参与子计画之协作条目，或者至计画发起处 发起子计画。若您支持该计画请先至此 签名，或至讨论页提出一些建议或问题。总之，这是可自由发起条目补强协作的相关平台，欢迎任何人（包含IP用户）在该计画提出协作请求或者帮忙协作，这比起在一两个同好之间对话或条目讨论页互动性更佳。根据过去经验，计画的成败关键在于消息是否散布开来，请将此消息继续推介给你您认识的维基人，若要发邀请函，可以使用以下代码：{{subst:QA/邀請}}张贴在对方的对话页中，感谢您的义举。
邀请人：RekishiEJ（留言） 2012年5月20日 (日) 07:50 (UTC)
目前票选中的主题：武侠小说提升计划 - 人文提升计画 - 新闻相关 -南极地理条目提升计划 -飓风主题计划 -哈利波特条目提升计划
目前进行中的主题：
（更多候选主题）
关于TOTW候选
目前该页面仍有若干重要、篇幅不长但语文版本数目过少（少于十个）的候选只有提名人投票或反对票占总票数三分之一以上，如en:Mount Monadnock、en:Mononymous person、en:Rap rock、en:Anti-copyright、en:List of most visited art museums in the world、en:Anthony Wayne、en:Data collection、en:Gotham Book Mart、en:Teacher-librarian、en:Anthony Aristar、en:Collier's Weekly、en:Mary Ellen Wilson、en:Linguistic Society of America、en:Christopher Poole、en:iolo technologies、en:Diary of a Camper，希望你能参与TOTW候选投票，毕竟先前已经有一些这类的候选落选（如en:Fear of youth、en:Fear of crime、en:British comics、en:United States of Africa、en:Artistic license、en:Customer experience、en:List of deadly fungi、en:Genna crime family、en:Go Ask Alice、en:Four Freedoms (Norman Rockwell)、en:Sino-Albanian split、en:Physics and Star Wars、en:CD-Text、en:LGBT tourism、en:Smart power、en:Second Superpower、en:Nomenclature codes、en:Basketball (ball)、en:Kick-Ass (comics)、en:WoWWiki、en:Asian Century、en:Lucifer Chu、en:Image stitching、en:Google Chrome Frame、en:Cloud gaming、en:Thaification、en:Intel 440BX、en:Socialism (Marxism)、en:Crony capitalism、en:Historiography and nationalism、en:Anarchism and nationalism、en:Michael P. Fay、en:Yamazaki Ansai、en:Yoshinogari site、en:Shinbutsu bunri、en:Independent bookstore、en:alt.religion.scientology、en:Control message、en:Malaysian Malaysia、en:iLoo、en:ESPN Radio、en:Bulbous plant、en:Houston Museum of Natural Science、en:Military of Austria-Hungary、en:Visual music、en:List of murderers by number of victims、en:Lee Kwon Mu、en:Generation Kill、en:Private defense agency、en:Private intelligence agency、en:Navy Yard, Washington, D.C.、en:River Tone、en:Canoe River train crash、en:Site-specific browser、en:Newspaper theft、en:Christianised sites、en:Tableless web design、en:George B. Post、en:File viewer、en:4DOS、en:Coconut doughnut、en:The central science、en:Difference between chemistry and physics、en:1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + · · · 、en:Artificial scarcity、en:Kurt Chew-Een Lee、en:McMartin preschool trial、en:Day-care sex-abuse hysteria、en:Press Association、en:Eric Eldred等），而TOTW就是每周各语文版本维基百科翻译二个条目（2010年第8周以前是一个条目）以扩充各语文维基百科收录范围的计划，这类条目的落选对不少语文版本维基百科是大憾事，我不希望类似案例重演。--RekishiEJ（留言） 2012年5月20日 (日) 07:50 (UTC)
致 《维基百科政策公报》读者：
我们想要让您知道，以2017年11月15日至12月14日为期，共有针对方针与指引的新提案25项，已通过4项。谨就通过者加以介绍：
- 特色图片标准已经修订，图像最少大小放宽至1000像素并订下例外条款。
- 翻译指引已经修订，增加翻译注意事项。
- 勇于提问指引已经确立，提醒用户要勇于发问，以达致减少争议。
- 签名指引已经修订，提醒用户毋须于结构讨论页签署。
编撰小组
2017年12月21日 (四) 11:57 (UTC)
借由MediaWiki message delivery（留言）所发送
《维基百科政策公报》是第一份关注于维基百科政策建设的刊物，由R96340、Aotfs2013及J.Wong等编撰小组共同编撰，帮助社群成员掌握方针与指引的脉动。《维基百科政策公报》将以月为周期，于每月15日定期发刊，欢迎任何感兴趣于维基百科政策的维基人订阅《维基百科政策公报》。若您没有主动订阅《维基百科政策公报》而收到《维基百科政策公报》，是因为您被编撰小组认为是应掌握维基百科政策脉动的使用者，您可以将您的使用者名称从公报发送名单订阅清单中移除，并在您的使用者页面添加特殊分类以停止透过《维基百科政策公报》掌握维基百科政策脉动。
《维基百科政策简报》政策异动通知
我们非常重视使用者对于接受《维基百科政策简报》的感受，在2017年12月号（创刊号）的发送后，我们注意到一些使用者对于简报的发送感到不适，对此我们感到万分遗憾，并且已于第一时间自相关清单中移除不愿继续收受简报发送的使用者。经过编撰小组审慎地评估与考量，我们决定在2018年1月号中取消对于引发一些使用者不适的List B的发送工作，为了在政策异动下维护您的权益，我们借由此则讯息向您通知相关政策异动；如您希望继续借由《维基百科政策简报》掌握中文维基百科之管理人员及方针指引变动，您可以将自己加入一份全新的专属清单以保持对于《维基百科政策简报》的订阅。
感谢各位读者对于《维基百科政策简报》的支持，我们希望能与您共同努力使中文维基百科更加美好。
此则讯息由《维基百科政策简报》编撰小组借由 MediaWiki message delivery（留言） 发送于 2018年1月14日 (日) 16:16 (UTC)。
打招呼
你好，很久很久很久没见。有用户在此留言是八年前的事情啊。上一次本用户在此留言是十四年余的事情啊。-- Ktsquare 留言 2019年7月15日 (一) 18:29 (UTC)
给您一个星章！
|
原星章 |
| 感谢您的贡献。 --Yining Chen（留言|签名） 2021年1月10日 (日) 05:18 (UTC) |