跳至內容

討論:程翔

頁面內容不支援其他語言。
維基百科,自由的百科全書
          本條目頁屬於下列維基專題範疇:
傳記專題 (獲評未知重要度
這個條目屬於傳記專題的一部分,用於整理和撰寫維基百科中的人物條目。歡迎任何感興趣的參與者加入這個專題參與討論
 未評級未評  根據專題品質評級標準,本條目頁尚未接受評級。
 未知  根據專題重要度評級標準,本條目尚未接受評級。


Untitled

The following sentence may violate the NPOV principle:

程翔一直被認為是一名非常親中的民族主義者,並支持兩岸統一。

There are controversy regarding the terms 親中 and 民族主義. 親中 is ambiguous as it may mean "pro-People's Republic of China" or "pro-Republic of China", while non-Chinese background readers may not understand.

Not all readers of Chinese-language wikipedia are ethnic Chinese.

Remember that Chinese politics articles are very sensitive so edit them after you have read the talk page thoroughly.

The term 羅生門 is difficult and ambiguous for non-Chinese native speakers, so it is better not to use it in wikipedia. Chinese-language wikipedia is not for native Chinese speakers only, and the needs of non-native Chinese speakers needs to be taken into account.

The sentence "程翔是香港居民,持有英國海外護照,並且是新加坡永久居民。" may be misleading. 英國海外護照 may mean 'British Overseas Citizen'(BOC) or 'British National (Overseas)' (BN(O)) passports, while BN(O) and BOC are different kinds of United Kingdom passports.en:British nationality law The sentence also overlooked the fact that Mr.Ching entered mainland China on his home return permit.en:Home Return Permit This indicates that the PRC Govt regards as a PRC Citizen. He is not solely British.

Moreover, many statements in the essay here are not supported by credible sources.

219.78.109.252 16:50 2005年7月24日 (UTC)

請自己酌情修改。--wooddoo 羊踏菜園 17:39 2005年7月24日 (UTC)

羅生門是什麼意思?

我看了羅生門這個條目,似乎有不了了之的意思,不知道對不對?我建議換掉這個詞,太有地方特色,不是普遍用語。瀑布汗 瀑布屋 18:15 2005年7月24日 (UTC)

"羅生門"現改為消岐義頁,請參看。--Whoevert 23:28 2005年12月26日 (UTC)

'親中的《文匯報》' - it is not necessary to describe the newspaper as 'pro-Beijing' in this way. I suggest the phrase 親中的 should be deleted. If readers are interested in information regarding the newspaper they should read the article 文匯報. 219.79.66.28 05:26 2005年7月30日 (UTC)

文匯報 already idenitfied as a pro-Beijing newspaper in Hong Kong.Even without that,their comments have shown their pro-Beijing view.