维基百科:关注度 (网站)

维基百科,自由的百科全书
跳到导航 跳到搜索

本文提供一些粗略指引,供中文维基百科编辑者参考,以决定任何形式的互联网站相关内容,不论是该网站的内容还是网站本身,是否值得在中文维基百科创建独立条目。互联网站内容包括但不限于网上漫画podcasts网志网络论坛线上杂志及其它传播媒体门户网站网页寄存服务。就本指引而言,任何仅在互联网上发放的内容皆在考虑范围内。[1]

维基人通常反对把维基百科当作广告工具,而维基百科不是宣传工具已是存在已久的一项正式方针。广告内容会被改写以符合中立观点,或被删除。[2]

维基百科不是一个网页目录,即是说它不是一个专门提供连结往其它网站及把那些连结分类的网站。维基百科不是一个镜像网站,也不是连结、图像或媒体档案的储藏库。那些只有外部链接及其内容的简短介绍的条目会被改写或删除。

有时候这些条目会被提请删除,维基百科编辑者可按照本文所述的条件把它们提交Wikipedia:删除投票和请求

条件

在中文维基百科,互联网上内容的关注度[3]是根据以下条件而定:

  • 该内容本身已成为多份非不重要的出版物所载内容的主题,而出版物上那些内容的来源与该网站本身无关联;或者,该内容本身影响了多份非不重要的出版物所载内容的主题,并在报导中被明确提及,而且在较长时间内一直有一定的关注度。
    • 此条件包括任何形式的出版物,诸如报刊及杂志文章、书本、电视纪录片及消费者监察团体已出版的报告。[4]下列情形除外
      • 媒体刊载的是该网上内容或网站的官方新闻稿及/或广告。[5]
      • 不全面提及,诸如(1)报刊文章仅简单提到该等网上内容的网址;(2)报刊文章仅简单报道该等网上内容的更新或可取得的时间;(3)该等内容本质的简短介绍或仅刊载网址及网站;或(4)在互联网目录或线上商店找到的内容描述。

上面列出的是Wikipedia:关注度的足以收录的中心条件。如果可以满足以下一些条件,关于某一网上内容的充足可靠资料应该可以找到。满足以下至少一项条件的网上内容可以成为维基百科的独立条目,因为关于它的可供查证的资料应该不少,而公众对它应该会有一点兴趣。

  • 该网站或内容已得到一份出版物或一个团体颁发一个著名的及独立的奖项。[6]
  • 该内容由一个著名的及与创立者无关连的媒体分发,这可以是一份线上报刊或杂志、一间线上出版商或一个线上广播者。[7]

条目内容需要提供证据,证明条目主角满足至少一项上面列出的条件,这可以在内文加入连结,也可以在“参考资料”或“外部链接”提供。即使一个完整的网站满足上述条件,它的组成部分(论坛、文章、分段)也不一定具知名度及不一定值得为这些部分各自创建独立条目。

相关页面

Notes

  1. ^ Content which has been packaged into material form, such as onto CD, DVD or book form, but which is still primarily only available for sale via the internet, still falls under these guidelines. If such packaging of the product is widely available for sale in major brick and mortar retailers, then it should be considered a product, for which see Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations).
  2. ^ Websites or content which fail these guidelines but are linked to a topic or subject which does merit inclusion may be 重定向 to that topic or subject rather than be listed for deletion.
  3. ^ Discussions of websites should be incorporated (with a redirect if necessary) into an article about the parent organization, unless the domain-name of the website is the most common way of referring to the organization. For example, yahoo.com is a redirect to Yahoo!. On the other hand Drugstore.com is a standalone page.
  4. ^ Examples:
  5. ^ Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. The published works must be someone else writing about the company, corporation, product, or service. (See Wikipedia:Autobiography for the verifiability and neutrality problems that affect material where the subject of the article itself is the source of the material.) The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, or vendor) have actually considered the content or site notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it.
  6. ^ Examples of such awards: Eisner Awards or Webby Awards. See Category:Awards for more. Being nominated for an award in multiple years is also considered an indicator of notability.
  7. ^ Content that is distributed by independent online sites will almost certainly satisfy the first criterion. However, this criterion ensures that our coverage of such content will be complete regardless. For example, Ricky Gervais had a podcast distributed by The Guardian. Such distributions should be nontrivial. Although GeoCities and Newgrounds are exceedingly well known, hosting content on them is trivial.